Practitioner tool · Version 1 (beta)

External Stakeholder Sorter

Lawmakers, reporters, partners, community groups, advocates, critics. Sort the people outside your organization who care about an issue, decide who gets your principal’s time first, and pick the right messenger for each.

Quick mode (hide the coaching notes)

Never enter classified, CUI or sensitive information. Use group names or roles where you can. This page has no server and sends nothing anywhere. Your list is saved in this browser only if you ask it to be.

Start here

The stakeholder salience model

This tool is built on the stakeholder salience model, published by Ronald Mitchell, Bradley Agle and Donna Wood in 1997 and still one of the most widely used ways to decide which stakeholders deserve a leader’s attention. Salience means how much priority you give a stakeholder’s claim. The model’s answer is that salience depends on three attributes, and the more of them a stakeholder has, the higher they should sit on your list.

Power

Can they change the outcome or impose their will? Power comes from force or the threat of it (a lawsuit, a protest, a vote), from money and resources (funding, contracts, purchasing), or from symbols and reputation (press coverage, public endorsement or criticism).

Rate it high if they could block, fund, sue, legislate or shape public opinion on this issue.

Legitimacy

Is their claim proper and appropriate in the eyes of a fair observer? Legitimacy can come from law or contract, from being directly affected, or from shared norms about what’s right. A stakeholder can have legitimacy without power, and power without legitimacy.

Rate it high if most reasonable people would say, “They have a right to be heard on this.”

Urgency

Does their claim call for immediate attention? Urgency has two parts: it’s time-sensitive (a deadline, a hearing, a news cycle) and it matters a great deal to them.

Rate it high only when both are true. A stakeholder who cares deeply but has no deadline is not yet urgent.

Seven types

The three attributes overlap to make seven types of stakeholder. Those with one attribute are latent (low salience), two are expectant (moderate) and all three are definitive (high).

Type	Has	What it usually means
Dormant	Power	Could act but has no reason to yet. Don’t give them one.
Discretionary	Legitimacy	A fair interest and no pressure. Often a willing partner.
Demanding	Urgency	Loud and insistent, with no power or legitimate claim behind it. The classic “mosquito.”
Dominant	Power + legitimacy	Expects formal attention and a seat at the table.
Dangerous	Power + urgency	Able and eager to act, without a legitimate claim. Can turn coercive.
Dependent	Legitimacy + urgency	A fair, pressing claim, but relies on others’ power to be heard.
Definitive	All three	Demands immediate, direct attention from the top.

Three things the model teaches

Salience changes. Stakeholders gain and lose attributes. A dependent community group that wins a council member’s support picks up power and becomes definitive overnight. That’s why the tool asks you to rescore after every move.
Loud isn’t the same as important. Urgency alone, without power or legitimacy, is one of the three low-salience types, even though it often generates the most noise.
It’s a judgment, not a formula. The ratings are your perception, and your perception can be wrong. Check your ratings with someone who knows the stakeholder, and say how confident you are when you brief your principal.

Source: Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. The stance strategies (involve, collaborate, defend, monitor) come from Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whitehead, C. J., & Blair, J. D. (1991), Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders, Academy of Management Executive, 5(2), 61–75.

How to use this tool

Name the issue. Salience is always about a specific issue.
Add each stakeholder and rate power, legitimacy and urgency for this issue. Medium or high counts as having the attribute.
Add their stance and who they trust. The model tells you who matters; stance and messenger tell you how to engage them.
Sort, then work the list from the top.
After each engagement or event, save a round, update the ratings and compare.

What’s the issue?

The issue or decision, in one line "Closing the visitor center on weekends," "Our new partnership with the county."

Why this matters. Stakeholders matter in relation to an issue. A local reporter may be the most important person on one story and irrelevant on the next. Sort for this issue, and sort again when it changes.

Who has a stake?

Rate each one on the model’s three attributes, for this issue. Use what you know, not what you fear.

Why this matters. Three questions separate the stakeholders who need your principal’s attention from the ones who just need an answer. Power: can they change the outcome, through votes, money, coverage, lawsuits or partners? Legitimacy: would a fair observer agree their claim is reasonable? Urgency: is it time-sensitive, and does it matter a lot to them? Both have to be true. The loudest voice isn’t always the one that matters.

After each move, rescore

Stakeholders change type. A quiet group gains a powerful ally; a deadline passes and urgency drops. Record what happened, update the ratings, and compare.

What just happened? "Met with the senator’s staff," "Story ran Tuesday," "Advocacy group got a council member on board."

Remember this list in this browser (stored only on this device)

Built on my own time from almost 20 years of advising senior leaders. It draws on public research: Mitchell, Agle & Wood (1997), “Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience,” for the seven stakeholder types; and Savage, Nix, Whitehead & Blair (1991) on matching strategy to a stakeholder’s stance.